Before I knew there was a word for them, I was watching a lot of mockbusters. Snakes on a Train, Paranormal Entity, and Transmorphers are just a few of the “classics” I took in as a young and credulous cinephile. Nowadays, I’m fully aware of what I’m getting into if I turn on the likes […]
Before I knew there was a word for them, I was watching a lot of mockbusters. Snakes on a Train, Paranormal Entity, and Transmorphers are just a few of the “classics” I took in as a young and credulous cinephile. Nowadays, I’m fully aware of what I’m getting into if I turn on the likes of Pet Graveyard or Ape versus Mecha Ape. So I fancied myself prepared for 28 Months After, a “new” movie that has, somehow, been mistaken for another 28 Days Later sequel. Within seconds of viewing, though, it should be evident that this isn’t related to anything from the 28 universe, much less on the same level as other mockbusters. I’d even go so far as to say this movie made me long for The Asylum.
The funny thing — well, one of many funny things — about 28 Months After is that it’s not a new release. It hitches a ride on the 28 Years Later publicity train, for sure, but this movie dates as far back as 2012, and Google shows it was added to the streaming service Tubi back in 2023. There is also its alternative title to consider; before changing names, the movie was originally called Aftermath. At the very least, the rebranding helps avoid any confusion with other Aftermaths. This includes a 2014 post-apocalyptic movie that actually came up third in my results when I searched for 28 Months After on Tubi.
Not helping the movie escape accusations of false sequelizing and shameless opportunism is the poster used for 28 Months After. That choice of a biohazard symbol positioned behind the title is as obvious as it is brazen. Meanwhile, the image of a soldier masked up and geared up is nothing more than an enhanced